Legal Opinion

State v. Bellcourt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 25, 1977No. 46078PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Defendant, appealing from judgment of conviction of aggravated robbery, Minn. St. 609.245, claims (1) that identification procedures used violated his right to due process, (2) that admission of two photographs of him and other evidence improperly informed the jury of his criminal record, (3) that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of another criminal act by defendant committed after the offense for which he was being tried, and (4) that the trial court erred in sentencing him to an increased term in prison pursuant to the dangerous offender act, Minn. St. 609.16, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. LynchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. DeBaereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API