Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hardwood Door & Trim Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by George W. Johnson against the Hardwood Door & Trim Company. From an order denying a motion to vacate an attachment, Herbert E. Millhollen, a junior attaching creditor, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion -of the appellant, a junior attaching creditor, to vacate the plaintiff’s attachment. The action is on contract, and the defendant a foreign corporation. The appellant sought to vacate the attachment on proof by affidavit that the original consideration, out of which the obligation in suit sprang, was the purchase by the defendant, from plaintiff's assignor, of certain shares of the defendant’s own-capital stock; and it also, by proof, showed that such a purchase was, by the law of Pennsylvania (the domicile of defendant), void. The motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowles v. HoareNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Brown v. WigtonNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newell v. WhitwellMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. HagemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Furbush v. NyeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Guarantee Savings Loan & Investment Co. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API