Legal Opinion

Furbush v. Nye

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Charles A. Furbush, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special. Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 3d day of February, 1897, setting aside the service of the summons, dismissing the complaint against the defendant Hye, and vacating a warrant of attachment granted against him in the action.

1Opinion of the Court

Rumsey, J.:

This is an appeal from ;an order setting aside the service of a summons^ dismissing the complaint against the defendant Rye, and ■ vacating a warrant of attachment which was granted against him in the action. It appeared, from the papers that all of the parties to the action are non-residents of this State, and that the defendant Rye appeared specially in the action for the purpose only of setting aside the service of the summons and vacating the warrant of attachment. ■ The motion was granted by the learned judge at Special Term for the reason, as appears in his opinion, that all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. CrockerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Johnson v. Hardwood Door & Trim Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Bata v. BataNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Sudbury v. Ambi Verwaltung Kommanditgesselschaft auf AktienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Henry v. SalisburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Catapodis v. OnassisNew York Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API