Legal Opinion
Snell v. G.D. Searle & Co.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided October 10, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-AR-0983-SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
On March 13, 1984, this court denied Searle’s motion for summary judgment as to two of plaintiffs’ claims or causes of action, the first based on an alleged breach of an implied warranty and the second based on Searle’s alleged wilful or wanton conduct in that Searle is charged with continuing to market the IUD after notice of its dangerous propensities. After further discovery, Searle has now refiled its motion for summary judgment as to each of the said remaining two counts and has filed an alternative motion to dismiss the so-called wanton count as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Frericks v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Goldstein v. G. D. Searle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Mattos, Inc. v. HashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Simmons v. Clemco IndustriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Hobbs v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001