Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Clemco Industries

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1979PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division, requests that this court re-examine certain questions previously certified to this court in an action for breach of warranty brought by Albert Johnson, Alfred Love, and Thomas Simmons for personal injuries they sustained due to defects in sandblasting hoods manufactured and distributed by Clemco Industries and/or Pulmosan Safety Equipment Company.

The plaintiffs were employed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Geohagan v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Vines v. Crescent Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Parker v. Fies & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ronald Basil Hart, Jr. v. Yamaha-Parts Distributors, Inc., Yamaha International Corporation, Yamaha Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Ogle v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API