Legal Opinion

State v. Van Sickle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1987No. 15500PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Dan Van Sickle, appeals his conviction on two counts of aggravated assault. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was charged with two counts of aggravated assault on May 5,1985. Defendant’s mother hired him an attorney but the attorney withdrew when defendant allegedly refused to cooperate.

A preliminary hearing was held July 1, 1986. When defendant appeared without counsel, the court noted defendant’s counsel had withdrawn and asked defendant whether he intended to represent himself. Defendant chose to proceed without legal counsel.

Arraignment was held on July 7,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. James R. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ChamleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. AsmussenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RaymondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. CashmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. IrvineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API