Legal Opinion
State v. Asmussen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 2006No. 23477, 23478PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] David J. Asmussen (Asmussen), appeals from a conviction for stalking. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶ 2.] Asmussen and Pamela Dunn (Dunn), were involved in a long-term romantic relationship that ended sometime in August 2000. On August 25, 2000, in Cod-ington County, South Dakota, circuit court, a protection order against further domestic abuse was issued against Asmussen as provided under SDCL Chapter 25-10. The protection order prohibited Asmussen from “contactpng], directly or indirectly, in any manner” Dunn, her daughter, Dunn’s mother, any other member of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. BowkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kaiser v. University Physicians ClinicSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Wilcox v. VERMEULENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. BeckleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. StoneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.