Legal Opinion
State v. Cashman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1992No. 17684PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
State appeals an order dismissing a Part II Information charging Michael Cashman (Cashman) with third offense driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On June 6, 1991, state filed an information charging Cashman with one count of DUI and one count of driving with a revoked license. State also filed a Part II Information for third offense DUI alleging Cashman had two prior DUI convictions. Cashman pled guilty to the principal DUI and not guilty to the Part II Information.1
A court trial on the Part II Information took place on July 17, 1991.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. Van SickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Iowa v. TovarSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. AesophSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. RaymondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Parks v. McClungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.