Legal Opinion

Carr v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1923No. 23,172PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover for legal services rendered and expenses incurred in procuring the legal restoration of the defendant’s wife to competency, she having been adjudged incompetent by a probate court. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

On July 23, 1919, the wife of the defendant was found insane by the probate court of Sibley county and she was placed in the custody of her husband. On April 6, 1921, Mrs. Anderson petitioned the probate court for a judicial restoration to capacity.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Lyon v. MinorMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fitzpatrick's Committee v. DundonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Lundstrom Construction Co. v. DygertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Wolf v. FriedmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dusenka v. DusenkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Reith v. County of MountrailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API