Commonwealth v. Hayden
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Separate appeals were filed by the appellants raising identical contentions and involving the same incident. The sole question is whether the lower eourt erred in dismissing appellants’ PCHA petition without a hearing.
Appellants filed petitions for review under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. In their petitions, appellants alleged that their guilty pleas had been involuntarily and unintelligently made. Originally, appellants tendered guilty pleas to charges of rape, sodomy and aggravated assault and battery. In the colloquy before the trial judge, appellants admitted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NahodilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. MoskorisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth ex rel. Bush v. BushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. WelchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SherardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. WhittakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.