Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moskorison

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 129PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Defendant was convicted of common law rape and was sentenced. In this appeal it is argued that under the evidence he may have been guilty of fornication only and accordingly there is reversible error in the failure of the trial judge in his charge to clearly differentiate fornication from rape and to instruct the jury that under the circumstances the defendant could be convicted of the misdemeanor alone. We find no merit in the contention.

Following a casual acquaintance of but a few days Katherine Neely, then 19, made a tentative date with the defendant for Thursday,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ParkerAllegheny County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1892
  2. Commonwealth v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. PeachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Commonwealth v. SpanosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. IrvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. BozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API