Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whittaker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 1981No. 1234PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

The only issue appellant, John Whittaker, raises in this appeal is whether the post-conviction hearing court properly dismissed his post-conviction hearing act petition without conducting a hearing. See the Act of January 15,1966, P.L. (1965) 1580 § 1 et seq., 19 P.S.A. § 1180-1 et seq. (1981-2). More specifically, appellant contends that a hearing is necessary because “the record clearly demonstrates (1) that the Petitioner reluctantly entered his guilty pleas; and (2) that his (public defender) counsel was confused as to the amount of ‘back-time’ the defendant would be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. SherardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. ChumleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. BunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. EdringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Com. v. Bivans, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API