Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Finkelstein

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The note in suit was made by the defendants . in May of 1907, and was originally secured by a mortgage of real estate. It became due in 1912; and about March 26, 1915 was assigned to the plaintiff by the payee, her brother. A foreclosure sale of-the mortgaged property made in 1917 did not realize enough to satisfy it. The writ is dated July 26, 1917.

The makers parted with their equity of redemption in the real estate before the maturity of the note. There was no evidence to show whether in this conveyance their grantee assumed and agreed to pay the note. They defended upon the ground that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hutchings v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Murphy v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  3. North End Savings Bank v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Codman v. DelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Rock v. Indian Orchard MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whalen v. Worcester Electric Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Silverstein v. SasterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Rome v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Lynn Five Cents Savings Bank v. PortnoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API