Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 7, 2014No. Civil Action No. 12-518-SDD-SCRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

SHELLY D. DICK, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant, Tamko Building Products, Incorporated (“Defendant” or “Tamko”).1 Plaintiffs, Jorge Fernandez and Renee Fernandez (“Plaintiffs” or “Plaintiff”2), have filed an Opposition to the motion.3 For the reasons which follow, the Court finds that the Defendant’s motion should be granted in part and denied in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Number 15 felt is a saturated felt under-layment used during the roofing process to provide a temporary moisture barrier which protects the wood…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Coty Inc.United States Circuit Court · 2018
  2. Pike v. Trinity Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  3. Dang v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  4. Estate of Richard Matus, Jr. v. County of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
  5. Perrilloux v. Kubota CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API