In Re Evans
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
The sole contention of petitioner is that his confinement in the State Prison at Folsom, which is predicated upon a plea of guilty to a charge of grand theft, is unlawful in that at no time did he personally enter such a plea, and that therefore the trial court was without jurisdiction to proceed to judgment and sentence against him.
In support of his contention petitioner has filed herein a transcript of the proceedings at the time of pronouncing sentence, a portion of which reads as follows:
‘‘ The above entitled matter coming on for hearing at 2:00 o’clock P. M., on Monday, May 29,1944, in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. SecaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re BrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- People v. LitchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. HawthorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. HymesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- In Re De Beau Carr Ex Rel. SteveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.