Raphael v. Gomez

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 WILLIAM RAPHAEL, 6 Case No. 2:25-cv-01338-NJK1 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 [Docket No. 6] MARCOS GOMEZ, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Docket No. 6. The Court does 12 not require further briefing or a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. 13 “A federal court does not have jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been 14 served properly.” Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Techs., Inc., 840 F.2d 685, 15 688 (9th Cir. 1988). Rule 12(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of…