Legal Opinion

Wolf v. City of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Ingbam. (Gridley, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

The charter of the city of Lansing provides that

“No person shall engage in or exercise the business or occupation of tavern-keeper, inn-holder, common victualer, or saloon-keeper, within the limits of said city, until he is first licensed as such by the common council; all hotel or tavern-keepers, inn-holders, or common victualers, who shall keep a bar in connection with their hotel, tavern, inn, or common victualing establishment, and all grocers, druggists, and all other persons who shall sell beverages by the glass or cup in their respective establishments, which are usually sold in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kitson v. Mayor of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Ash v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Dewar v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Village of Mount Pleasant v. VansiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Alma v. ClowMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. BlomMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kenaston v. RikerMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Pacific R.R. Adver. Co. v. ConradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API