Legal Opinion

People v. Gaio

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2000No. B125769PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COOPER, J.

Frederick Gaio, Jr., and Rick Lynn Hodgin appeal from judgments imposed after a jury convicted them, respectively, of three counts each of receiving a bribe (Pen. Code, § 68; undesignated section references are to that code) and giving a bribe with a value in excess of $400 (§ 67.5, subd. (b)). Gaio received a five-year sentence, and Hodgin was sentenced to a term of three years and four months. Appellants also were assessed restitution fines of $1,000 for Gaio and $600 for Hodgin, and direct victim restitution of $21,479.84, payable jointly and severally to Los Angeles…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. United States v. Terry ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. KurtenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. AndraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API