Legal Opinion

Frostman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 9, 1992No. 92-0243PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

Theodore and Helen Frostman appeal a summary judgment dismissing their action against Portage County, Michael Borski and Sentry Insurance (collectively, the county) for negligently operating a snowplow. The trial court held that the county was immune from liability as a matter of law because plowing snow is a discretionary act and because of the public policy considerations stated in Sanem v. Home Ins. Co., 119 Wis. 2d 530, 539, 350 N.W.2d 89, 93 (1984). Because we conclude that the legislature, by enacting sec. 345.05, Stats., expressly declared that municipalities should be held liable for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. C.L. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Paape v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sanem v. Home Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Krist Oil Co. v. Bernice's Pepsi-Cola of Duluth, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  2. Gillen v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gillen v. City of NeenahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API