Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gillen v. City of Neenah

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1998No. 96-2470Published

1Concurrence

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 59. (concurring). Although I agree that the plaintiffs' failure to file a notice of claim with the City of Neenah pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 893.80(l)(b) (1993-94)1 does not bar the plaintiffs' action against the City, I cannot join Part II of the per curiam opinion for several reasons.

¶ 60. First and fundamentally, the holding of the per curiam opinion is not applicable to the facts of this case. The per curiam opinion holds that because the plaintiffs' complaint sought injunctive relief under Wis. Stat. § 30.294, no notice of claim need be filed with the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Mueller v. BrunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Figgs v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API