Legal Opinion

Cummings v. City of Dearborn, Michigan

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1937No. Nos. 7243, 7244Published

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

The District Court directed a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that Nagy, the driver of the car, in which plaintiff’s ward, Gus Cummings, twenty years old, was riding, was guilty of negligence. This was error for two reasons: (1) Because in a federal court the contributory negligence of Nagy, the driver, cannot be imputed to Cummings, the passenger. Wabash R. Co. v. Walczak, 49 F.(2d) 763 (C.C.A. 6) ; Commercial Elec. Supply Co. v. Greschner, 59 F.(2d) 512 (C.C.A. 6). And (2) because the negligence of a driver is never imputed to a minor passenger [Fairchild v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fairchild v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Butler v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wabash Ry. Co. v. WalczakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  4. Commercial Electric Supply Co. v. GreschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API