Wabash Ry. Co. v. Walczak
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
Appellee recovered a judgment in the court below for injuries sustained when the automobile in which he was riding was struek at a grade crossing in the city of Detroit by one of appellant’s trains. The only question of serious moment is whether the court below should have directed a verdict under the doctrine of Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U. S. 66, 48 S. Ct. 24, 72 L. Ed. 167, 56 A. L. R. 645. The car belonged to and was being driven by an adult son of appellee, and there-was substantial evidence to the effect that, upon reaching the crossing, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Erie R. Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Hines v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Landers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Hewlett v. SchadelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Baltimore & O. R. R. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Detroit Edison Co. v. StrickerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.