Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Marriage of Wilson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 17, 1989No. 62,028Published

1DissentKennedy, District Judge

Appellant argues K.S.A. 60-1802 prevents an action for divorce from abating after the death of one of the parties. This argument ignores the survival of claims statute, K.S.A. 60-1801. In Gross v. VanLerberg, 231 Kan. 401, 405, 646 P.2d 471 (1982), the Supreme Court stated that “whether a particular cause of action survives the death of a party is to be determined by K.S.A. 60-1801. K.S.A. 60-1802 simply provides the procedure for the continuation of an action by substitution of parties in cases where the cause of action survives the death of a party.”

Pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1801, it must be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. DubishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Caprita v. CapritaOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mabry v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API