Legal Opinion
Bard-Parker Co. v. Crescent Manufacturing Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 13, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
A permanent injunction is sought restraining the defendants from unfairly competing with the plaintiff. Not only do defendants deny the charge of unfair competition, but they assert affirmatively that it is the plaintiff who is the offender, and they, accordingly, counter with a demand for relief against the plaintiff. A temporary injunction was granted by Mr. Justice Cohn and upheld (247 App. Div. 716, 717).
The plaintiff manufactures and distributes “ Bard-Parker ” detachable surgical blades invented and patented by its president, Morgan Parker. The patent has expired. These blades,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Charles Broadway Rouss, Inc. v. Winchester Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Bomeisler v. . ForsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- CR Bard, Inc. v. Wordtronics Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Harvey Machine Co. v. Harvey Aluminum Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Shrout v. TinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Diesel Oil & Burner Corp. v. New York Diesel Heating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.