Legal Opinion
Harvey Machine Co. v. Harvey Aluminum Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1957PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFelix O. Benvenga, J.
In this action of unfair competition, plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from using “ Harvey-Machine ” and “ Harvey Aluminum ” as part of their corporate names.
*1079The complaint sets forth two causes of action. The first is based on the common law of unfair competition and infringement of plaintiffs’ trade name and mark; the second is for a violation of section 964 of the Penal Law, which not only makes it a misdemeanor to use another’s trade name or mark with intent to deceive or mislead the public, but also provides for injunctive relief under such circumstances.
Leo Harvey (hereinafter…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- COLUMBIA BROADCAST. SYST., INC. v. Melody Recordings, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Onassis v. Christian Dior — New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. First American Fund of Funds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Continental Corrugated Container Corp. v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Flexitized, Inc. v. National Flexitized CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.