Legal Opinion

CR Bard, Inc. v. Wordtronics Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 28, 1989PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 N.J. Super. 168 (1989)

561 A.2d 694

C.R. BARD, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

WORDTRONICS CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND WX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A SUBSIDIARY CORPORATION, AND MEADOX MEDICALS, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division (Civil) Union County.

April 28, 1989.

Richard E. Brennan, for plaintiff (Shanley & Fisher, attorneys).

Thomas J. Goodwin, for defendant (Krugman, Chapnick & Grimshaw, attorneys).

MENZA, J.S.C.

This is defendant — Meadox's motion for summary judgment. The unique question presented is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Spiegel, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Leslie Blau Co. v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. McCue v. DeppertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Nostrame v. SantiagoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. A.K. Stamping Co. v. Instrument Specialties Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API