Anderson v. Phillips
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioner, having been appointed to fill a vacancy in an office of the Superior Court for the County of Alameda, seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondents, the presiding judge of the superior court and the superior court itself, to assign judicial duties to him. By leave of the court, the Governor has been permitted to intervene. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387.)
We have concluded that although petitioner may not compel that judicial duties be assigned to him, he nevertheless is entitled to require *736respondent presiding judge to exercise his discretion to determine whether such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People ex rel. Sweet v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Shepherd v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- State of South Dakota v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Fields v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Stanton v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.