Legal Opinion

Villanueva v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 6, 1989No. 01-87-00298-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

COHEN, Justice.

The Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this cause for reconsideration of appellant’s second and third points of error in light of its holding in Rose v. State, 752 S.W.2d 529, 552 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (op. on reh’g). In his second and third points of error, appellant argued that the trial court erred by overruling his objection to the parole charge, Tex.Code Crim.P.Ann. art. 37.07, sec. 4(a). Ch. 576, sec. 1, 1985 Tex. Gen.Laws 2195, amended by ch. 66, sec. 1, 1987 Tex.Gen.Laws 170, amended by ch. 1101, sec. 15, 1987…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Urbano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Atomanczyk v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Atomanczyk v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API