Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Proceedings against Spinelli
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 25, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SERATA, J.S.C.
This is an application by the chief of police of the Borough of Penns Grove to obtain tape recordings of telephone conversations authorized by the Salem County prosecutor pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:156A-4(c).
This opinion supplements the court’s oral decision.
*529I.
Facts.
On February 4, 1986, the Borough of Penns Grove police department filed disciplinary charges against Detective-Lieutenant Edmund Spinelli pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A-.14-147. The complaint charged that Spinelli violated the rules and regulations of the Penns Grove police department by “engaging in conduct unbecoming to an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- American Friends Service Committee v. William H. Webster, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. IannelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boettger v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Estate of Lagano v. Bergen Cnty. Prosecutor's OfficeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- Dampman v. MorgenthauNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Boettger v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Title III Electronic Surveillance Material and the Intelligence Community, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2000