Legal Opinion

Andrew P., et al. v. Blue Cross of California DBA as Anthem Blue Cross

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 15, 2025No. 5:25-cv-02158Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ANDREW P., et al., Case No. 5:25-cv-02158-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA DBA AS [Re: ECF No. 38] ANTHEM BLUE CROSS, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Blue Cross of California’s (“Blue Cross’s”) motion to 14 dismiss Plaintiffs Andrew P. and L.P.’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 15 Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 38 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 45 (“Reply”). Plaintiffs oppose the 16 motion. See ECF No. 44 (“Opp.”). The Court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API