State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
Pursuant to CrR 8.3(b), the trial court may dismiss a criminal prosecution when governmental misconduct prejudices the accused’s right to a fair trial. Alexander Martinez was charged as an accomplice to first *24degree assault and a number of other crimes. During trial, the State revealed evidence of an exculpatory nature that the defense claimed it had never received. The jury voted 10 to 2 to acquit and the trial court declared a mistrial. When the State then refiled charges, defense counsel moved to dismiss on the basis of CrR 8.3(b) and double jeopardy grounds. The trial court heard…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State of Washington v. Scott Michael WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. SHELMIDINECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.