Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 25, 2004No. 21597-1-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Pursuant to CrR 8.3(b), the trial court may dismiss a criminal prosecution when governmental misconduct prejudices the accused’s right to a fair trial. Alexander Martinez was charged as an accomplice to first *24degree assault and a number of other crimes. During trial, the State revealed evidence of an exculpatory nature that the defense claimed it had never received. The jury voted 10 to 2 to acquit and the trial court declared a mistrial. When the State then refiled charges, defense counsel moved to dismiss on the basis of CrR 8.3(b) and double jeopardy grounds. The trial court heard…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State of Washington v. Scott Michael WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State v. SHELMIDINECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API