State v. Laskey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurrence
0 ’Neill, J.,
concurring. I concur in the conviction of the defendant upon the charge of first degree murder.
The majority opinon is per curiam and, thus, presents *199no syllabus which states the law of the case. Therefore, each member of the court concurring in the majority opinion is committed to each statement of law therein as establishing a rule of law.
That portion of the opinion with which I can not agree reads as follows:
“* * * The record in this case reveals that appellant did not object to the exclusion of Wilkins [a juror who was challenged and dismissed for cause]. This failure to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.