Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Laskey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1970No. 68-185Published

1Concurrence

0 ’Neill, J.,

concurring. I concur in the conviction of the defendant upon the charge of first degree murder.

The majority opinon is per curiam and, thus, presents *199no syllabus which states the law of the case. Therefore, each member of the court concurring in the majority opinion is committed to each statement of law therein as establishing a rule of law.

That portion of the opinion with which I can not agree reads as follows:

“* * * The record in this case reveals that appellant did not object to the exclusion of Wilkins [a juror who was challenged and dismissed for cause]. This failure to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API