Rickardo Stephens v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, C.J.
Rickardo Stephens appeals the trial court’s denial of his pro se motion to withdraw plea after sentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(Z). Prior to the court’s ruling on Stephens’ motion, his counsel withdrew on the grounds of conflict. Although Stephens requested that the court appoint him conflict-free counsel in his motion, the court summarily denied it without appointing conflict-free counsel. We find error and reverse.
Rule 3.170(Z) provides for a motion to withdraw plea within thirty days after sentencing on grounds specified in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Nelfrard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Schriber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. StricklandOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- James H. Tipler v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Flemming v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Gianni Passino v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- DOMINICK R. WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.