Legal Opinion

Nelfrard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 2010No. 4D08-4418PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

After entering a plea and being sentenced for possession of cocaine, appellant filed a timely motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(J). He claimed that his counsel coerced him into entering a plea and misinformed him as to the maximum penalty he could face. The trial court summarily denied the motion, attaching a copy of the transcript of the plea colloquy. On appeal, appellant claims that the trial court erred in failing to appoint an attorney to represent him where he alleged a conflict with his current attorney in his motion. We affirm, concluding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Scheele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Snodgrass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Schriber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rickardo Stephens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Thompson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. James H. Tipler v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Abbate v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API