Gianni Passino v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtStevenson, J.
The instant appeal arises from defendant’s motions to withdraw plea, one made just before the oral pronouncement of sentence at defendant’s resentencing1 and one made shortly after resentencing. Defendant alleges error in the summary denial of both motions. We affirm as to the pre-sentence motion to withdraw plea. See Ruiz v. State, 109 So.3d 1183, 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (affirming denial of pro se rule 3.170(£) motion; motion was a nullity since it was made while defendant was represented by counsel and “devoid of allegations giving rise to an adversarial relationship with counsel” (citing…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Rickardo Stephens v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- St. Cyr v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Gunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BRIAN M. CHIPMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Jeromee Saffold v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2026