Legal Opinion

Edwaun Victor Moore v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 2004No. 03-15587PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

1. Petitioner argues that, contrary to People v. Landry, 212 Cal.App.3d 1428, 261 Cal.Rptr. 254 (1989), California’s sec ond-degree felony murder rule is a judicially-rather than statutorily-created offense, and therefore violates separation of powers under California law. Thus, because his conviction for second-degree murder may have been based on an unconstitutional felony-murder theory, it violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process under Hicks v. Oklahoma, 447 U.S. 343, 100 S.Ct. 2227, 65 L.Ed.2d 175 (1980).

Even if petitioner were correct that Landry misstates California law,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. David L. Murtishaw v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API