People v. Hansen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, J.
In this case we must determine whether the offense of discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling house (Pen. Code, § 246)1 is a felony “inherently dangerous to human life” for purposes of the second degree felony-murder doctrine, and, if so, whether that doctrine nonetheless is inapplicable in the present case under the so-called “merger” doctrine applied in People v. Ireland (1969) 70 Cal.2d 522 [75 Cal.Rptr. 188, 450 P.2d 580, 40 A.L.R.3d 1323] and its progeny. For the reasons explained hereafter, we conclude that this offense, for such purposes, is a felony inherently…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.