Legal Opinion

People v. Hansen

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. S036384PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

In this case we must determine whether the offense of discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling house (Pen. Code, § 246)1 is a felony “inherently dangerous to human life” for purposes of the second degree felony-murder doctrine, and, if so, whether that doctrine nonetheless is inapplicable in the present case under the so-called “merger” doctrine applied in People v. Ireland (1969) 70 Cal.2d 522 [75 Cal.Rptr. 188, 450 P.2d 580, 40 A.L.R.3d 1323] and its progeny. For the reasons explained hereafter, we conclude that this offense, for such purposes, is a felony inherently…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. IrelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. Frandsen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API