Legal Opinion
Fleet v. Hooker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 1936No. 27077PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original action for writ of prohibition to prevent the enforcement of an order of the district court of Oklahoma county requiring petitioners to in-terplead in a cause pending therein, and set up what right, title, and interest they claim in certain real estate located in Coal county, Okla., and enjoining them from interfering with said lands.
In 1933 the holder of two promissory notes given by one E. W. Whitney, an individual, brought suit in the district court of Oklahoma county upon the same. The notes were unsecured and the petition therein set up no legal or equitable claim…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- National Tube Works Co. v. BallouSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chapin v. StuckeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Rose v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Grant Drilling Co. v. ReboldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Fred v. GENTSCH, INC. v. BURNETTNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.