Rose v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an original action to prohibit the enforcement of orders made by the respondent, district judge, suspending- the petitioners from office as members of the board of education of Oklahoma City. The county attorney and Attorney General are not essential parties, though named in the action Our alternative writ issued July 5'th permitted the district judge, who is hereinafter referred to as the respondent, to show cause why peremptory writ of prohibition should not issue, or in the alternative permitted the granting of a hearing to petitioners on the matter of their suspension after notice…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. McAllister v. SlateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Peters v. BucknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Martin v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Williamson v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Burford v. SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Turk v. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Creighton v. District Court of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Conkling v. De LanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.