Soto v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
Milton Soto pleaded guilty to first-degree statutory sodomy in violation of section 566.062, RSMo 2000. He subsequently filed a post-conviction motion pursuant to Rule 24.035 contending there was an insufficient factual basis for his plea in that there was no evidence of penetration. The motion court denied relief. Soto appeals. 1 Under the facts of this case, penetration was not an element of the offense. The judgment is affirmed.
The facts forming the basis of the plea
At the plea hearing, the prosecutor stated that the evidence would show that Soto placed the hand of a four-year-old on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- State v. PondSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Care and Treatment of Schottel v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. FewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Derousse v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Becker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Greene v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Conley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.