Legal Opinion

Causey v. Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 3, 1939No. 34823PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

These are the same two consolidated cases that were recently on appeal before this Court. That appeal was prosecuted by the defendant from a judgment confirming a default. This Court annulled the judgment and remanded both cases fo'r further proceedings according to law. 187 La. 659, 175 So. 448. After the mandate reached the district court, the defendant filed its answer in each suit.

The suits are petitory actions in which Truman M. Causey, as curator of the vacant successions of William Shields and of Robert Rogers and Caroline Z. Hudson, seeks to recover Sections 40 and 41,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  2. Veasey v. PetersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. State v. Winehill & RosenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  4. Black v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Causey v. Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Vallo v. Gayle Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Giamalva v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  4. Egle v. ConstantinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. Southern Enterprises, Inc. v. FosterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API