Legal Opinion
Egle v. Constantin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 3, 1941No. 35454PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs allege that, together with the five minors named in their petition, they are the owners of Lots Two and Three in Section 23 and Lots Two and Three in Section 24, Township 22, South, Range 22 East, in the Parish of Lafourche, and that the defendants are in the actual, physical possession of the lands, without title, and refuse to deliver the possession thereof to plaintiffs. They allege that they acquired the lands as the heirs of Baptiste Egle and his wife, and by purchase from some of their coheirs; that Baptiste Egle acquired the lands from the State of Louisiana…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tillery v. FullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Griffing v. TaftSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Ashley Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Pierson v. Castell Land & Harbor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Close v. RowanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Ewald v. HodgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Carlisle v. GravesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.