Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Phillips

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1870PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding. The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

On the eighteenth of December, 1867, appellee was injured by the explosion of a boiler of the railway company, in the Union depot at Chicago. The case was brought to this court in 1868, and reversed and remanded. (49 Ill. 234.) Since then, a second trial resulted in a judgment against appellants for $16,000, and this appeal is prosecuted for its reversal.

The declaration alleges that the engine was old, worn out, insecure, and wholly unfit for use; and that the company did not, by its servants, exercise due and proper care in its use and management.

The proof does not justify the charge of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coughlan v. Baltimore & Ohio Rail RoadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  2. Field v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. PhelpsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hull v. Sacramento Valley RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & PowerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  2. Stone v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Stone v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Hicks v. Peninsula Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Bolger v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API