Legal Opinion
Van Durr v. Kator Scott, Chartered
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 2002No. 00-CV-784PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Winzoir Van Durr appeals pro se from a judgment in favor of Kator & Scott, Chartered, in the latter’s breach of contract suit against him for unpaid legal bills. Van Durr complains of the conduct of the trial, alluding to the improper introduction of allegedly manufactured evidence, the admission of hearsay and related rulings of the court. In addition, Van Durr contends that the trial court wrongly permitted Kator & Scott to disobey a court order to furnish discovery. Kator & Scott denies Van Durr’s allegations and argues that they have no support in the record before us.
We are unable to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stockard v. MossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- United States v. AlstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Stebbins v. StebbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crockett v. Deutsche Bank National TrustDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Ivey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Edwards v. CLIMATE CONDITIONING CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
- Williams v. District of Columbia Department of General ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024