Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 13, 1972No. 1 CA-IC 651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

Does an industrially compensable death occur where two heart attacks are present, the first of which is not industrially related, but during the period between the two, the deceased works, thus “aggravating” his heart condition? This is the question presented in this appeal by cer-tiorari from an award of The Industrial Commission denying compensation to the widow.

’ For twenty years prior to his death, the. deceased Billy W. McNeely, had been employed as a maintenance mechanic for Reynolds Metals Company. Unbeknownst to him, he suffered from coronary artery disease and had a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Claim of Masse v. James H. Robinson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Tatman v. Provincial HomesArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Otto v. Moak Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API