Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Orders, entered August 31, 1965 and January 7, 1966, affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event. The complaint, and each alleged cause of action, though inartistieally drawn, sufficiently show a cause of action. The causes of action grounded in fraud allege that the plaintiffs were induced to open, maintain and enlarge commodities investment accounts with defendant brokerage firm by reason of fraudulent misrepresentations of defendants, including false and fraudulent factual representations with respect to experience of defendant Crisafulli, a customers man, in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co. v. McIntosh & Seymour Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Czarnikow, MacDougall & Co. v. BaxterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Smith v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Smith v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Gilman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Tenzer v. EllenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Zuckerwise v. Sorceron Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- CAE Industries Ltd. v. KPMG Peat MarwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.