Legal Opinion

Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co. v. McIntosh & Seymour Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We think the complaint sets out a cause for deceit and that the damage is sufficiently alleged to come within the rule that the damages are such as are the natural consequence of the defendant’s act or default. Whether the precise rule of damage is invoked is not material to the question of whether or not a cause is alleged, and this must be left to the trial to determine. *654The defenses set out are not sufficient, admitting plaintiff’s claim, to defeat the cause by way of confession and avoidance, and consequently should have been struck out of the answer.

The order should, therefore, be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daukas v. Shearson, Hammill & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. 422 W. 15th St., Inc. v. Estate of Bradish JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Montague Associates, Inc. v. Gallo Wine Distributors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API