Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Independent School District Number One of Tulsa County v. Williamson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 17, 1960No. 39012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
The only question presented for consideration is the legality and validity of the facsimile signatures of the County Clerk and the County Attorney.
It is the contention of the defendant that the Uniform Facsimile Signature of Public Officials Act (Title 62 O.S.Supp. 1959, Secs. 601-606) is in conflict with and violates the provisions of Sec. 29, Article X, Oklahoma Constitution, in that it purports to authorize a facsimile signature of public officials on public bonds, as a substitute for an autographed manual signature required by the fundamental law of the State.
Section 29 of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Maricopa County v. OsbornArizona Supreme Court · 1943
- Moss v. ArnoldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Standard Co. Dairy v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Spearman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Salt Lake City v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Opinion No. (1968) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.