Legal Opinion

Moss v. Arnold

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1938No. A-9408PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

(after stating the facts as above). This is an original proceeding instituted in this court, seeking to prohibit the respondent as a judge of the district court of Oklahoma county from taking and exercising further jurisdiction over the petitioner and the subject-matter involved, wherein petitioner is charged with contempt of court.

On the filing, of the petition it was presented to the court; all parties present in person and by counsel. Respondent demurred to the petition upon the ground that the petition does not state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to a writ of prohibition. After…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. SavinSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. People ex rel. Choate v. BarrettNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ex Parte DawesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Bustamante v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Gilbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1982
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API