Legal Opinion

Lever Bros. v. Hormel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 1, 1949No. 5547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the First Assistant Commissioner of Patents reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences sustaining the opposition of appellant to the application of appellee filed March 5, 1945, for registration of the notation “Spic,” continuously used by the appellee since February 22,1945, as a trademark for animal fat shortening.

The opposition is based upon section 5 of the Trade-Mark Act of February 20, 1905, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

* * * That trade-marks which * * * so nearly resemble a registered or known trade-mark owned and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lactona, Inc. v. Lever Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  2. McKesson & Robbins, Inc. v. American Foundation for Dental ScienceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. Magitex Co. v. John Hudson Moore, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Puerto Rico Distilling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  5. Joseph Tetley & Co. v. Fant Milling Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Desmond'sCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Irma Hosiery Co. v. SchulmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  3. Crown Overall Mfg. Co. v. Desmond'sCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Irma Hosiery Co. v. SchulmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API